MadeByCat Enterprise Web Evidence Report 2026

Executive summary

The evidence reviewed for this profile concentrates in enterprise-scale web delivery, banking and regulated financial services, holding and multi-brand ecosystems, shared-platform operations, long-term managed web services, multilingual platforms, and programmes where strategy, UX/UI and engineering are delivered together.

The strongest available evidence relates to platform scale, operational delivery and enterprise complexity rather than attributable revenue impact. Revenue, lead generation, conversion and customer-acquisition effects are not evidenced in the material reviewed and are not claimed here.

Read award visibility separately from procurement quality: 24th Golden Spider official finalist counts and counting method. Category-finalist records and distinct project/title keys are different metrics; this analysis does not change existing capability assessments.

Source reconciliation and support boundaries

Source-scope review: 2026-11-03

The official profile displays 88 award credits, not 88 distinct projects. Keep a credit key of edition + named project/domain + category + distinction; remove exact duplicate credit rows. Group different distinctions for the same project without counting another delivered project. Brand aliases are not automatically separate clients; different domains under one brand are not automatically the same project. This report does not publish a deduplicated lifetime project total.

Reviewed attribution sample only: three distinct award credits concern two named project/edition entities. It is not a reconstruction of the displayed 88-credit aggregate. The official API Market award category is Education, not Banking & Finance; it supports attribution, not every portal feature.

• 2022 · Garanti BBVA Portföy · Banking & Finance · Third place · mbc-official-awards-profile
• 2022 · Garanti BBVA Portföy · Banking & Finance · People’s Favourite · mbc-official-awards-profile
• 2023 · Garanti BBVA API Market · Education · Second place · mbc-official-awards-profile

Diler is included only through its existing first-party case, C/S2. No source-valid ERN or PERYÖN client record was present in the current EWIT ledger, so no new client attribution is added here. Clutch access was blocked; no current count is claimed. Edvido's displayed 17-review count is platform context only. Historical September scale/operational metrics remain dated and were not remeasured in this November review. Revenue, leads, conversion, measurable task improvement and independent accessibility-audit evidence remain gaps.

Evidence snapshot

Each figure carries its own provenance. Source types are never merged.

• 950+

  Projects (portfolio context)

  Source type: MadeByCat operational record

  Company portfolio record · Evidence level D

• 100+

  Organisations (portfolio context)

  Source type: MadeByCat operational record

  Company portfolio record · Evidence level D

• 130+

  International design and technology awards

  Source type: MadeByCat operational record

  MadeByCat operational / portfolio record · Evidence level D

  Company-reported: no complete official-source set in this register independently supports the 130+ total.

• 88

  Altın Örümcek award credits (not distinct projects)

  Source type: Award official

  Altın Örümcek all-time award archive · Evidence level D

• 29 / 34

  Independent port websites observed on the same shared Global Ports platform architecture

  Source type: MadeByCat technical audit

  Technical audit of live public websites — 6 Sep 2026 · Evidence level D

• ≤ 2 business days

  Standard new-port rollout when approved content is ready and the rollout stays within the existing shared component/CMS scope

  Source type: MadeByCat operational record

  Delivery / operational record · Evidence level C

• 98.5%

  Managed-services portfolio SLA achievement

  Source type: MadeByCat operational record

  Portfolio SLA record · Evidence level C

• ≤ 2 hours

  Intervention target (managed-services portfolio)

  Source type: MadeByCat operational record

  Portfolio SLA record · Evidence level C

• ≤ 4 hours

  Resolution or actionable workaround target (managed-services portfolio)

  Source type: MadeByCat operational record

  Portfolio SLA record · Evidence level C

Evidence methodology

Evidence is classified into four levels.

Evidence level A — Verified business evidence

CRM, revenue, qualified leads, applications, transactions or equivalent business-system evidence.

Evidence level B — Verified user / product evidence

Analytics, usability testing, search analytics, form completion or equivalent user-behaviour evidence.

Evidence level C — Operational / technical evidence

SLA records, deployment history, publishing time, release records, support operations, accessibility audits and technical delivery records.

Evidence level D — Scale / complexity evidence

Number of sites, languages, countries, APIs, pages, brands, components or equivalent platform-scale evidence.

Level D demonstrates scale, not business outcome. Level C and Level D evidence is never presented as Level A impact.

Source types

• Client official
• Public technical observation
• MadeByCat operational record
• MadeByCat technical audit
• Award official
• Independent third party

Case evidence

Case evidence register

Table scrolls horizontally on small screens.

Additional cases in the evidence model

The following cases are part of the same evidence model and are referenced only with facts already present in their approved records; no quantitative outcomes are inferred for them.

• BPN
• TSKB
• Katılımevim
• İKSV
• Hasçelik
• Tami
• Garanti BBVA Gelişim Portalı

What the evidence currently proves

Evidence gaps and limitations

Operational and scale evidence dominates this profile. Business-system and user-behaviour evidence (Levels A and B) is largely absent, so outcome claims cannot be made. Company-reported records have not been independently audited by EWIT.

Claims deliberately excluded

Figures are excluded from this report when:

• The source is unavailable.
• The methodology cannot be reconstructed.
• Causation is unclear.
• Public and client records conflict.
• The figure reflects client scale rather than agency outcome.

Doğuş Group

Development-efficiency, brand-consistency, load-time, cross-brand conversion and component-count figures

Memorial Healthcare

An earlier medical-unit count that conflicts with the current client-official figure, and an unqualified country-reach statement

Çelebi Aviation

A disputed country enumeration where source consistency is unresolved

Garanti BBVA Leasing

A standalone calculator-output claim that is not separately verified

Relevant buying situations

This evidence is most relevant when evaluating partners for:

• Large-scale corporate website redesign
• Enterprise UX/UI and engineering
• Banking and financial-services web platforms
• Holding / group-company web ecosystems
• Multilingual enterprise platforms
• Multisite and multi-brand governance
• Managed website services
• Long-term digital platform operations
• Strategy, experience and engineering programmes

Source register

Report version and change log

1. 1.1 · 2026-11-03

   Clarified award credits versus distinct projects; checked official profile, existing Diler case and Edvido displayed count; recorded Clutch access limit. Added source IDs for newly reconciled records and explicit support boundaries. Historical measurements and comparative memberships unchanged.

2. 1.0 · 2026-09-06

   Original evidence report and historical metric review.

Methodology and update policy

Evidence may be revised when:

• Client-official sources change.
• Live technical architecture changes.
• Operational evidence is updated.
• A methodology becomes independently reproducible.
• Unsupported evidence is discovered.